Factory JCW Dyno Test
Created by: IndyBill
Orig. Posting Date | User Name | Edit Date |
Aug 11, 2017 12:08PM | IndyBill | |
Aug 11, 2017 12:04PM | Dan Moffet | |
Aug 11, 2017 08:41AM | IndyBill | |
Aug 11, 2017 08:36AM | kenatminimania | |
Aug 10, 2017 11:32AM | IndyBill |
Total posts: 4
Last post: Aug 11, 2017 Member since:Aug 10, 2017
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Moffet
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyBill
So basically, I will never know how the mods impacted the car (other than I know it is a LOT quicker than it was before). Thanks for the response!
Total posts: 9544
Last post: Apr 24, 2024 Member since:Aug 14, 2002
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyBill
So basically, I will never know how the mods impacted the car (other than I know it is a LOT quicker than it was before). Thanks for the response!
.
"Hang on a minute lads....I've got a great idea."
Total posts: 4
Last post: Aug 11, 2017 Member since:Aug 10, 2017
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
So basically, I will never know how the mods impacted the car (other than I know it is a LOT quicker than it was before). Thanks for the response!
Total posts: 2271
Last post: May 23, 2023 Member since:Dec 29, 2004
|
Cars in Garage: 1
Photos: 9 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyBill
I have a 2014 JCW Roadster that I had modified and re-tuned for more HP and torque. Like an idiot, I didn't put it on the Dyno before the modifications were made so I don't have a baseline comparison to know just how much improvement I made. The factory HP and torque measurements are taken at the flywheel and the Dyno measures at the tires, and there is a calculated loss from the fly to the tires. So, my question is, has anyone ever had their JCW 56, 58 or 59 tested on a Dyno before any mods were made, and would you share the results. OR, does anyone live in Indianapolis, have a JCW 56, 58 or 59 and would you be willing to have your car put on a Dyno? I would be willing to pay the fee to get the baseline numbers.
Just so you know, my Roadster now has 229 HP and 263 lb/ft of torque, appreciably higher than the factory base at the flywheel.
Thanks for any help!
Just so you know, my Roadster now has 229 HP and 263 lb/ft of torque, appreciably higher than the factory base at the flywheel.
Thanks for any help!
Total posts: 4
Last post: Aug 11, 2017 Member since:Aug 10, 2017
|
Cars in Garage: 0
Photos: 0 WorkBench Posts: 0 |
I have a 2014 JCW Roadster that I had modified and re-tuned for more HP and torque. Like an idiot, I didn't put it on the Dyno before the modifications were made so I don't have a baseline comparison to know just how much improvement I made. The factory HP and torque measurements are taken at the flywheel and the Dyno measures at the tires, and there is a calculated loss from the fly to the tires. So, my question is, has anyone ever had their JCW 56, 58 or 59 tested on a Dyno before any mods were made, and would you share the results. OR, does anyone live in Indianapolis, have a JCW 56, 58 or 59 and would you be willing to have your car put on a Dyno? I would be willing to pay the fee to get the baseline numbers.
Just so you know, my Roadster now has 229 HP and 263 lb/ft of torque, appreciably higher than the factory base at the flywheel.
Thanks for any help!
Just so you know, my Roadster now has 229 HP and 263 lb/ft of torque, appreciably higher than the factory base at the flywheel.
Thanks for any help!